Followers are nonetheless getting used to watching Ken Jennings host Jeopardy! day-after-day, and after a ruling he made through the Sept. 14 episode, some suppose he is not fairly as much as the job. Durning the sport that aired on Wednesday, Jennings made what some viewers consider was an unfair name for one contestant although he had allowed one other fixed—that episode’s returning champion—to do one thing related earlier within the recreation. Viewers voiced their opinions on social media, and the contestants concerned within the controversy spoke out, too. Learn on to seek out out what occurred and why some individuals are accusing Jennings of being biased on social media.
READ THIS NEXT: Former The View Co-Host Says Her Heart specialist Advised Her to Give up the Present.
Jennings—who holds the file for profitable essentially the most consecutive video games in Jeopardy! historical past—turned host of its day by day syndicated present in September 2021. At this level, his position wasn’t thought of everlasting. In July 2022, it was introduced that Jennings could be an official host of the present, which started its thirty ninth season in September. Jennings shares the job with actor and neuroscientist Mayim Bialik, who’s the emcee for Jeopardy! primetime specials, together with the Nationwide Faculty Championship.
Jennings solely simply began his run as an everyday, everlasting host, and he is already going through some backlash. As reported by Folks, throughout Wednesday’s episode, returning champion Luigi de Guzman was given the clue “Here is a typical Nineteenth-century panorama by this British painter” and proven a photograph of a portray. De Guzman responded, “Who’s Fixed?” to which Jennings stated, “Say that once more.” De Guzman then stated, “Sorry. Constable. Who’s Constable?” referring to artist John Constable, and the response was dominated right.
For extra celeb information delivered proper to your inbox, join our day by day e-newsletter.
Later within the recreation, contestant Harriet Wagner was given a clue a few fantasy author born in Berkeley, California. She responded, “Who’s Angela Le Guin—sorry, Ursula Le Guin.” The response was dominated incorrect. De Guzman then buzzed in with the proper reply and was awarded the $2,000 for that clue.
Jennings defined, “Sure, Harriet, you remembered that her identify was Ursula, however I had already begun ruling in opposition to you once you started correcting your self.”
Ultimately, de Guzman ended up profitable in what was an in depth recreation. Wagner ended up in third place, however was solely $700 behind de Guzman and $100 behind second place contestant Winston Li.
Viewers who didn’t agree with Jennings’ rulings spoke out on Twitter.
One Twitter user wrote, “she was correcting Angela to Ursula and acquired debited. I like Ken, however he must work on some issues. Not honest tonight.” Another said, “Anybody else watch @Jeopardy tonight and suppose Ken was egregiously inconsistent together with his rulings on solutions by Luigi and Harriet?” Someone else posted, “@Jeopardy Luigi provides flawed reply, Ken asks him what, then provides right reply. Harriet says flawed first identify, then whereas she begins to right herself Ken interrupts and guidelines her incorrect. SO INCONSISTENT and unfair.”
Just a few viewers questioned whether or not the choice needed to do with the contestants’ genders. One fan tweeted, “#jeopardy why did Ken Jennings let one contestant (male) change a flawed reply, however dominated in opposition to one other (feminine), regardless that she stated the proper reply throughout the time restrict? Tonight’s episode was an unfair runaway due to that ruling on the final reply in double jeopardy.” Someone else added, “I agree! That was completely unfair and Ken Jennings (and the ‘judges’) had been completely flawed to not give her credit score for an accurate reply. Is the #misogyny from #Jeopardy? Positive appears to be like prefer it!” Another fan wrote, “Ken provides the man a second likelihood however not the lady!!! #Jeopardy #kenjennings.”
In accordance with the official guidelines of Jeopardy!, “Contestants could change their responses so long as neither the host nor the judges have made a ruling.” The present’s web site explains, “Should you’re giving a response and all of a sudden hear your mouth saying one thing your mind wasn’t planning on – or overlook to phrase your response within the type of a query—you’ll be able to right your self; however you will should be fast.” As Jennings stated on the present, he had already begun ruling in opposition to Wagner when she modified her response to “Ursula Le Guin.”
After the episode aired and viewers started slamming Jennings on social media, each Wagner and de Guzman responded. As reported by TheJeopardyFan.com, Wagner tweeted, “Go away Ken alone!!!! He is my primary man (apart from my hubby) and has to work in actual time the identical because the contestants. He is doing an amazing job.”
As reported by TV Reveals Ace, de Guzman additionally posted in regards to the backlash. In a series of tweets, he defined what was going via his head when he stated “Fixed” after which “Constable” and gave his tackle the state of affairs.
“If I might have been Ken, I might have both reduce each of us off, or hesitated each instances. However that wasn’t the facet of the stage I used to be on on the day, and it took a substantial amount of separation in time and house for me to observe it and see it,” de Guzman posted. In one other tweet, he wrote, “I particularly need to shout out @Harriett4332263’s grace right here. I’ve pinged her about this, and she or he has proven me the grace befitting an amazing litigator. Meaning quite a bit to me, and I actually admire it.”